by Jeff Landers, CDFA, Bedrock Divorce Advisors, LLC, * LTD Contributor
How the Valuation Dates of Different Assets Are Decided During Divorce
You think you want to keep the house. He says he’s more interested in his business. What will happen to the stock portfolio, retirement accounts, the vacant beachfront property and the art pieces you bought together?
It won’t be an easy task, but there’s no getting around it: Divorce requires the division of all your marital assets.
And, as you can imagine, in order to partition those assets properly, each must be assigned an accurate dollar value.
In divorce, the point in time in which an asset is assigned a dollar value is called its valuation date.
That sounds relatively straightforward, doesn’t it? Since each asset needs a dollar value, all you have to do is simply pick a date and appraise each item as of that date. Well, unfortunately, like most other aspects of divorce, the determination of valuation dates isn’t typically very straightforward at all. In fact, the process can be quite complex.
For starters, the value of an asset can significantly vary depending on the date that is chosen to be its valuation date. Plus, each state has its own specific regulations and guidelines. For example:
- In New York, the Court must select a valuation date as soon as possible after the divorce action has commenced.
- Other states may use the trial date, the date of separation, the date the divorce complaint was filed or another date as the valuation date.
Since there is often a long delay between separation and divorce, you’ll want to work closely with your divorce team to help you work through these nuances, so that, to the extent possible, you can use a valuation date that is the most advantageous to you. (The complexity of assigning a valuation date is nicely illustrated in this list of each state’s laws.)
How does the valuation date differ from the date of separation?
In my last article, I discussed why divorcing women need to pay careful attention to the date of separation (DOS).
And, because there’s often confusion between the DOS and the valuation date, I want to make the distinction between the two very clear.
As I mentioned in that article, the DOS usually draws a very significant line of demarcation. It’s the line in the sand between when you were married (and functioning as a couple) and when you were separated (and no longer functioning as a couple). The DOS is important because it helps determine the division between marital and separate property –and because it can be used to establish a valuation date.
Sometimes, the DOS, itself, is used as the valuation date. But, in other cases, it’s not.
(At the risk of sounding like a broken record here, let me caution you once again. State laws vary greatly, so please consult with your divorce team to ascertain how these matters are determined in your state.)
Which assets are typically valued as of the DOS, and which are typically valued as of the trial date?
Generally, active assets are valued as of the DOS, while passive assets are valued as of the trial date.
An active asset is any marital property that can change in value due to the actions of its owner. For instance, a business, a professional practice and even the marital home can be considered active assets. As you can see, it makes sense for an active asset to be valued as of the DOS –otherwise, the spouse who controls the asset might allow its value to diminish as the divorce proceedings unfold.
A passive asset, on the other hand, is any marital property that can change value because of forces beyond the direct control of its owner. For example, vacant land and stock portfolios may be considered passive assets because their value depends on market forces.
What difference does it make if an asset is valued at one date or another?
Assigning a valuation date can have a significant impact on the value of a particular asset.
The easiest way for me to explain this is by using examples.
In a New Jersey appeals case, the husband owned a seat on the New York Stock Exchange. The seat nearly doubled in value between the time of the filing of the divorce complaint and the time of the divorce trial. Which date should be used as the valuation date? The Courts ruled that the date of the divorce trial should be used as the valuation date. In this case, the increase in value was viewed as entirely passive since it was not based on the actions of either party.
In other cases, different rules apply. For instance, a business that is managed by only one spouse is usually considered an active asset and would typically be valued as of the DOS (or commencement of the divorce action in New York). This approach makes sense for two reasons:
1 – To protect the spouse who controls and manages the business. Should the value of that business increase between the DOS and trial date due to the efforts of the managing spouse, then that spouse should be awarded the benefits of his/her labor.
2 – To protect the non-managing spouse. Should the spouse who controls and manages the business decide to run the business into the ground, the non-managing spouse should not suffer any loss as a result of the managing spouse’s actions.
I’m sure you won’t be surprised to learn that in the current volatile economic situation, things can get even more complicated. For example, a judge may rule that any decrease in the value of a business was a result of the recession and had nothing to do with the actions of the managing spouse. In essence, the judge could deem a normally active asset (the business) to be a passive asset and therefore would use the trial date as the valuation date rather than the DOS (or commencement of the divorce action in New York).
While the complexities surrounding the “straightforward” concept of valuation date can seem a bit confusing at times, don’t feel overwhelmed. Your divorce teamwill help you work through the specifics of your case, and with their help, you’ll be able to manage your assets and develop a comprehensive plan for continued financial stability and security in the future.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Jeffrey A. Landers, CDFA™ is a Divorce Financial Strategist™ and the founder of Bedrock Divorce Advisors, LLC (http://www.BedrockDivorce.com), a national divorce financial strategy firm that exclusively works with women, who are going through, or might be going through, a financially complicated divorce. He also advises women business owners on what steps they can take now to "divorce-proof" their business in the event of a future divorce. He can be reached at Landers@BedrockDivorce.com.
All articles/blog posts are for informational purposes only, and do not constitute legal advice. If you require legal advice, retain a lawyer licensed in your jurisdiction. The opinions expressed are solely those of the author, who is not an attorney.
Follow Jeffrey A. Landers on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Bedrock Divorce
Jeff is also the founder of Bedrock Divorce Advisors, LLC, a divorce financial advisory firm that works exclusively with women throughout the United States, and ThinkFinancially.com, a website created to educate, empower and support women before, during and after divorce.
He writes a weekly blog for Forbes.com on the financial aspects of divorce for women called Divorce Dollars and Sense and contributes articles regularly to The Huffington Post, More.com, Lawyers.com and many others.
Jeff has also been extensively interviewed about the financial aspects of divorce by CBS and Fox Television News and such prestigious publications as The Wall Street Journal, Miami Herald, Dow Jones, Smart Money, Consumer Reports, The Christian Science Monitor and many others.
Jeff earned his BA degree in psychology from Columbia University and studied law at Pace University School of Law before becoming a divorce financial advisor.
Latest posts by Jeff Landers (see all)
- Seven Key Points Divorcing Women Need To Know About Real Estate And Real Estate Appraisals - March 19, 2015
- Non-Profit to Offer Divorce Help to Abused Women - April 26, 2012
- Key Steps to Help Women Protect Finances When Leaving an Abusive Marriage - April 26, 2012